For: Maribel Hastings (*)
It is necessary to be bringing some election over when the republican senator of Arizona, John McCain, it considers to be necessary to send a letter along with another republican senator of the same state, Jon Kyl, neither more nor less than to question a decision of the federal government that involves Deputy Joe Arpaio.
Two republicans question why the Department of National Safety (DHS) revoked the agreement 287 (g) that was allowing to Arpaio to apply the program in the streets of the county of Maricopa, Arizona. Now only undocumented persons allow him to identify in the jails of the county.
The newspaper Arizona Republic informed that in the letter McCain and Kyl they ask for major details of the review that the government led on the agreements 287 (g), the program that allows to local police officers to act as immigration agents.
The senators want that the Office of Immigration and Customs Control panel (HOIST) tells on what it was based to determine that Arpaio is not eligible to apply the program in the streets.
It seems that Kyl and McCain do not consider to be significant that the Department of Justice is investigating Arpaio for supposed civil rights violations on having used racial profiles in his undocumented persons search.
Only that's why the DHS should have revoked to Arpaio two agreements 287 (g). Even more, Arpaio defied the federal government and there drove other of his operative famous persons of local community seeking protection in the state law “anti-coyotes“. And Arpaio makes sure that can decide who is undocumented for the appearance, the way of speaking, and for the presence in areas of high concentration of undocumented persons. This way of facilito. But the actions of McCain are not a product of the coincidence. Obviously they answer to that the next year faces the reelection and tries to pacify once again to the most recalcitrant conservative sector, especially now when it has potential challengers who compete for being the hardest against the immigrants.
This results in curious alliances. McCain and Kyl not always have been of the same side of the debate. McCain was a coauthor of a two-party project of integral migratory reform that did not progress. Kyl initially said to support the two-party efforts to obtain this reform, but finally Kyl devoted himself to obstruct the advance of this measurement.
Also, McCain and Arpaio have been found precisely because the senator has supported what Arpaio pushes back flatly: a wide migratory reform.
|
|
McCain said to the publication POLITICIAN that the letter sent to the DHS only thinks about how to obtain all the information related to the decision to revoke the agreement 287 (g) with Arpaio to apply the program in the streets, and that has not taken a concrete position on Arpaio and the situation yet in general.
“ I have not been carefully dependent on him because I have not been there. I understand that it is a motive of significant controversy in Arizona and I have always tried to take the biggest respect as the law”, indicated McCain.
The senator also remembered his position in favor of a reform that “should assure the borders” and that should include a plan of temporary workpeople.
Clearly, consider the contending McCain potentials in the primary republican of August 31, 2010: Chris Simcox, founder of the group of frontier observers “Minuteman“; the businessman Jim Deakin, who on his web page under the immigration topic says “It does not amnesty, let's Assure the borders, let's apply the laws on visas, Illegal it is illegal”.
Other that is mentioned is the republican ex-conferee of Arizona, Jay D. Hayworth, who lost his bench in the elections of 2006 in spite of his extremist positions in the migratory topic.
Hence McCain tries to reinforce his credentials with the conservative base that keeps on seeing it with mistrust for supporting a wide migratory reform.
In the presidential elections of 2008, McCain tried to appeal to the same base separating from his plan of integral migratory reform insisting that first it was necessary to assure the borders and affirming that probably he would vote against his own project.
When the votes were taken into account, only 31 % of Latin Americans voted for McCain opposite to 67 % who voted for Obama.
Obviously there are differences between a general election and a state election, in this case in Arizona. But I wonder how it him will go to candidates who promote extremist measurements or only of hard hand in the migratory front. In the past they have not been fine. Will they prevail this time? Although also I wonder how it they will go to the candidates who say to support the migratory reform, but at the time of the hour they do not do anything.
(*) Senior Advisor de Americás Voice.
www.maribelhastings.com
|
